Last spring we spent considerable time and effort speaking with kids about the very public nature of "private" communication on the internet. In two assemblies and a parent session, we had outside resource people come in and explain to our students how exposed they really were in their emails, texting, tweets, and especially on Facebook.
After one such session I had the opportunity to gab with a group of P5/6s about cyber bullying, stalkers, and generally the inherent risks in hanging out all of their personal information on the web for just about anyone to see. What they were just beginning to grasp was that the actual audience for their comments was far broader than their intended one. Facebook "friends" quite regularly cut and paste or forward personal comments to people who were never intended to read them. And, once they are hung out there on the line for everyone to read, it is virtually (and physically!) impossible to reel them back in.
After much discussion and sharing of experiences, I began to feel like the kids were getting it and that in some small way, maybe we were helping them to self-edit what they were willing to share with the world. But...
I had it all wrong.
This summer I realized that we were directing our efforts at the wrong target (or rather at only one of our at-risk groups). As the beginning of the school year approached, I was intrigued by the increase in on-line traffic from staff members (both friends and friends of friends) publicly commenting on their lack of interest in going back to school. Sandwiched in between the expected "life would be great if we didn't have to work for him" comments were some pretty fundamental (and discouraging) observations like - "only 180 teaching days until next summer" - or "this year I plan to coast and do as little work as possible" and "I'm putting off going back in until the last possible minute". In addition there were some pretty negative remarks from individuals about their teaching colleagues and the quality of their schools.
People have always said this stuff, but when I was a young teacher, it was shared over a couple of beers in the backyard or at the local pub. Everyone took the opportunity to vent, critique, and proclaim their incredibly brilliant (and invariably simplistic) solutions to the complex issues around the running of their respective schools. It was a healthy letting off of steam, a little bit of big-mouthed posturing, and mostly harmless. If a negative comment about a colleague did get back to her or him it could usually be defused by a claim that the author had been misquoted, misunderstood, or just plain drunk! The fact is that the only "permanent" record of these observations was usually an embarrassing half-memory and a bit of a headache.
No more. In our age of instant messaging, our rants to our friends have become the stuff of public record. Comments permanently recorded on the web arrive there without context, and without the tone of voice, or note of exasperation or raised eyebrow that would cause a personal audience to take it with a grain of salt and pretty quickly forget about it.
As adults, we should know better and as professional educators, we should do better. Every teacher and administrator receives the occasional sarcastic (and sometimes venomous) email from a parent about some imagined injustice done to their daughter or son. In our instant age, we all know how this happens. A person gets ginned up (or perhaps "rummed" up in Bermuda) bangs something out and sends it. The content and language are such that they would never use over the phone or in person. But in an email or in a Facebook comment they can make the most outlandish remarks without fear of interruption or correction. Their spin on things becomes a part of the permanent cyber record and no matter how many subsequent conversations or comments lower the temperature of the exchange, the original comment remains, white hot, frozen in time and cyberspace.
Having suffered from these abuses of electronic communication we should, and must, do better to prevent ourselves from committing them as well. In discussion about just such a case with a colleague this week it was clear to me that the fact that something that had been posted as a very personal comment about a peer, had landed on my desk, was quite a shocking revelation to the author. I was definitely not part of the intended audience. The ripple effects of this incident remain to be seen - hopefully they will dissipate as quickly as hurricane Bill - but perhaps, if we're lucky, the lesson learned will have much more permanence.